Casey is a good guy. State grad. Ole miss law school though (ha, some irony).
Printable View
I remember a post last year where someone asked why we didn't challenge the Will Redmond situation. The response was that there was a lot more to the story than anyone knew.
I can imagine there is A LOT more to the NCAA investigation into OM athletics than any of us will ever know.
For clarity, John Doe isn't suing Steve or anybody else. He filed a notice of appeal of the ethics committee ruling. Additionally, since that appeal will not be heard in the next week (the deadline for OM to comply and release names), he filed essentially what is a preliminary injunction asking the Court to stay the release of the names until his appeal can be heard.
He most likely will get his stay, but when he does, and this is key, that in no way implies he will win his appeal. The release of the names by OM will just be stayed until John Doe's appeal is heard and decided. Hope this helps.
IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT JOHN DOE APPELLANT v. No. G2017-981 T/1 THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI, STEVE ROBERTSON, and________________________ (Who's name is redacted?)
APPELLEES MOTION FOR STAY OF COMMISSION?S FINAL ORDER
I knew when the case was "won" that this crap would happen. Either way, I no longer go to Taco Bell.
We went to summary disposition. That basically means you admit guilt, don't fight anything, and throw yourself at the mercy of the NCAA. You agree to take whatever medicine they give you with no appeal. Do not go to the COI, do not collect $200, go directly to jail.
This is what I'd like to know. There are like 15 boosters called out in the NOA. Regardless of what happens with this stay, they still have to release all the other names besides this John Doe based on the order of the Ethics Commission, unless they all file similar motions. Is this correct?
MY question is the Ethics Commision gave this moron the chance to have his particular name redacted, by just telling him which booster number he was in the NOA, so why didn't he do that? He refused and led them no choice. The ethics commision said OK then release it all, including whichever number you are. So again, my belief is this is a concerted effort by all of OM to delay any release of ALL names in the NOA.
What everyone is saying is it is only going to delay the inevitable. They think by suing everyone, for free, that everyone will back down because of the potential costs of litigation to those against them. Well you see that we are all willing to back our brothers such as Rosey as our players, so good luck with that shitbirds! Click a few ads so we can continue to bring you the truth!
what do y'all think of an opinion I saw on nafoom the other day? some dude said the booster names will produce nothing exciting because the big time donors would not be on any kind of list. they donate under the radar to keep their identities unknown. sounded legit.
just trying to widen the discussion. any opinions on this opinion? thoughts?
Can all 15 boosters named take turns going through the appeals process one at a time in order to delay it another couple years or more?
These boosters have powerful friends in government who can not control the NCAA but would will let the Ethics Commission go down in flames before allowing names released and will go to the nines to do so.
Hate to be the Debbie Downer on this but I'd be very surprised if we EVAR see the names released.
Jack Lambert: "Can that be kept secret for ever? Sooner or later the name is going to come out. Ole Miss people are the dumbest, dumb ****s, shit head, donkey dick ****ing, bull ass licking, sheep ***** eating, dick weeds."
It reminds me of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQXuazYI_YU