Anyone have the time frame for this? I'd like to see what the avg offensive ranking for each team is over the period also.
Printable View
Anyone have the time frame for this? I'd like to see what the avg offensive ranking for each team is over the period also.
Won't argue this point at all, even though for the most part Random and I disagree on the job Mullen's done here. We need better recruiting on the offensive line for sure.
I think we're doing pretty well everywhere else honestly - better than we ever did under Croom.
Total offense by year:
2009 - 73rd
2010 - 49th
2011 - 73rd
2012 - 60th
2013 - 76th
2014 - 17th
2015 - 33rd
2016 - 75th (to-date)
For reference, under Croom:
2004 - 118th
2005 - 114th
2006 - 97th
2007 - 97th
2008 - 116th
Source: http://www.sports-reference.com
I would look at scoring O and red zone efficiency as opposed to overall offense (both against SEC W only competition). You may can get by between the 20's with an average 0 line, but getting into the end zone inside the 20 is another matter.
And even better stat would be.
How many ALL SEC Olineman at the end of each season have we had over the last 8 years. (1st 2nd or 3rd team)
I wonder how we rank there..
I posted that a while back about the disparity between D personnel and O personnel in the league. Seeings as how Mullen is an OC I kinda expect it to be more equal than it is.
Freeze is not a great recruiter nor is he a good coach. He is a good salesman. That's it. Once he gets them, he lets them run the show. They do what they want for 3 or 4 years then when they try to make it in the NFL, they get a huge wake up call. I compare it to the Academy that I went to. I goofed off all through junior high and high school, teachers didnt care, and then when I got to junior college I was lost. I had to take intermediate Algebra before I could even take an Algebra class.