Mississippi Public Record Requests - Normal State Agency vs "We Can't Because...?"
This is just a scenario, of a few examples, to show the questionable validity of those, "we can't" responses. The top law firm in New York City sends a written public information request to your State Agency. They are in the process of filing a lawsuit against a well known major national corporation. The information that you have is vital to the suit, and they are also running a deadline. They are requesting, for the last four years, all emails, letters, inspections, warning notices, penalties and monetary fines relevant to this major corporation, your agency regulates. Documents that are a lot more sensitive in nature than any matters concerning boosters, NCAA enforcement and violations. Your agency representative contacts them back by phone and says "I'm sorry but Mr J, who handles these types of request is in Bermuda on vacation for 3 weeks, but I know when he gets back that he will be glad to furnish this information. Or, "I'm sorry but due to confidentality issues I regret that we can not allow the release of these documents at this time." Or, I'm sorry but the records that you have requested are with a third party out of state, and we can't access them at this time, and we have no copies of these documents in our office ( not under your purview then? hmmm). Have a nice day." This is not your typical operating procedure of a normal State Ageny The synopsis is if this did happen in your normal State Agency, somebody, in your agency, would be reprimanded or possibly lose their job, and your agency would still find some way to furnish those requested (non-exempt) records, in a timely manner, and within the prescribed timeline of the public records act. These major law firms do not play those "we can't" games. Could have been very interesting if somebody like Attorney Mars had made NOA public records' requests.